The article “Eternity for Plato: The Dialogue between Parmenides and Timaeus” by Aleksei Pleshkov, was published in the book “Plato’s Parmenides. Selected Papers of the Twelfth Symposium Platonicum” (Academia Verlag, 2022).
The volume, edited by Prof. Dr. Luc Brisson, Dr. Arnaud Macé, Dr. Olivier Renaut, brings together a selection of papers presented at the Platonicum XII Symposium on Plato’s Parmenides, July 15-19, 2019 in Paris. The book contains fifty essays that testify to the vitality and variety of Platonic studies of this difficult dialogue. It is divided into six sections that represent a path through the dialogue according to its most important articulations:
I. On the threshold of the Parmenides
II. Parmenides in context
III. Dialogue, dialectics, exercises
IV. The theory of forms
V. The hypotheses
VI. Parmenides and his Reception.
More information here
Article annotation
The distinction of time and eternity plays a crucial role in Plato’s ontology. Nevertheless, up to the Timaeus, Plato does not offer a more or less complete analysis of the concept, and even in this late dialogue, his definition is still ambiguous. The two most common interpretations of eternity in philosophical literature, temporalism and traditional eternalism, I believe, are not suitable for Plato’s philosophy. The third interpretation, neo-eternalism, considers eternity as atemporal duration, i.e., the present that endures without slipping into a succession of past-future, fits Plato’s concept of eternity much better. Based on the analysis of the unique status of the present (ὁ νῦνχρόνος or τὸ νῦν) in the flow of time in the Parmenides and the eternity (αἰών) of the Paradigm which abides exclusively in the present (τὸ ἔστιν) in the Timaeus, I adapt the neo-eternalistic interpretation of the concept for Plato’s eternity. According to such reading, eternity for Plato is not transcendent to time, but the principle and necessary condition of time always given in the present, hic et nunc. In other words, eternity is the fundamental intuition of being expressed in a simple ‘is’ regardless of temporal differentiation.